cartridges are currently listed as available. Here’s a look at three of the best. If you're looking for a cheap shooting round to acclimate you to shooting, the .223 is cheap, and the .22LR is cheaper yet. If you've shot one before, you know how effective the .243 is when it comes to taking down deer. BTHP T2 TAP 5.56 NATO. We offer cheap ammo and bulk ammo deals on the most popular ammo calibers. But what, you might wonder, are some suitable “light recoil” cartridges? I’d call action availability a draw. A .223 Rem. If you want to go to a 6.5 eventually start there, use the money for a 223 and put it toward reloading components or ammo. The .308—a fine design in and of itself—has been responsible for a number of successful cartridges, but the .243 has to be the most successful. Go with the .223 Remington as the recoil that cartridge produces is virtually non-existant. was designed as both a light deer rifle and a varmint cartridge—it can hold its own against high-velocity .22-calibers but still provide enough oomph to take down larger animals. True .223 Remington and .243 Winchester ballistics information can vary widely from the displayed information, and it is important to understand that the particular characteristics of a given round can make a substantive difference in its true performance. We offer a 100% Authenticity Guarantee on all products sold on our website. The .223 performance. 6mm-223 (75 at 2950) 7.5: 4.6: 0: 6mm Norma BR (95 at 2914) 8.5: 5.9: 6.7: … I'm looking for a caliber that can reach out to 500 yards when needed and touch a varmint. As if that’s such a painstaking decision. As Chuck Hawks notes in his great recoil table, the .223 Rem. However, since the difference between them (223 vs 308) is pretty big in certain respects, each cartridge is better suited to specific situations than the other. However, since the difference between them (223 vs 308) is pretty big in certain respects, each cartridge is better suited to specific situations than the other. can reach out even further. A 243 is a .308 case necked down to .243 I have seen the splash in my scope many times with both but the .243 has more recoil. Still, when comparing cartridges, foot-pounds of energy is a helpful way of describing the weight of a projectile and how fast it’s moving. One way to think about this is as such: a foot-pound is a unit of energy equal to the amount of energy required to raise a weight of one pound a distance of one foot. The .223 is a great varmint round and is cheaper to shoot that the .243 There’s no shame in admitting and owning this. This is enough difference and enough recoil for the .308 to throw off shots during the pull. You can find lever, bolt, and semi-auto rifles chambered in both actions. It's very possible that you'll get the bug to go hunting in the future,and if you do-the .243 will be your best bet then. It's also 1000 yard capable, and has low recoil , lower than the .260 Rem. In my opinion, I would stay away from getting a bull barrel for a kid. Just make sure your gun is … But this is not a normal year. A 243 Winchester versus 7mm-08 Remington match-up will cause some readers to raise the "apples to oranges" red flag, but that doesn't mean this comparison is out-of-bounds. Ballistics Cartridges Shooting. The AR-15 chambered in .223 Rem. This section is as clear of a decision as any other category we will discuss on the .243 vs .308. As a rule of thumb, when it comes to hunting, muzzle energy is what many hunters look at when deciding on what caliber of firearm / ammunition to select. If you’re looking for a semi-auto, you’ll likely have better luck finding a .223 Rem., but lots of companies chamber semi-auto guns in .243 Win. Latest. Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by browning308, Feb 10, 2011. As illustrated in the chart, .223 Remington rounds - on average - achieve a velocity of about 3150 feet per second (fps) while .243 Winchester rounds travel at a velocity of 3180 fps. That extends the maximum effective range all the way to 350 yards, depending on your velocity at the muzzle. This does come at the expense of more (though not excessive) recoil and muzzle blast though. Bolt action rifles, lever action, pump action, self loading rifles and other miscellaneous longarms. Maximum effective range is another way to compare one caliber to another. A .223 you can shoot hundreds of rounds over many hours without feeling the effects like you would from a .243. For more detailed ballistics information please refer to the exact round in question or contact the manufacturer for the pertinent information. I've fired both and the 22-250 typically has more recoil because I shoot faster loads in it. Don't discount the .243 Winchester as a long range cartridge. By contrast, six of Federal’s 17 .243 Win. wins in a landslide. Mag. But even with full power stuff like Hornady 75 gr. Use anything from 55gr pills for the small stuff up to 95gr pills which are hard hitting for bigger things. While the media loves to portray this as a ‘huge assault bullet’ and only meant for use in warfare, the truth is that a .223 round is a relatively small and not particularly powerful. And the Winner Is… head shots, and be very picky about what bullet..243 offers way more ammo choices for deer and a bit more energy for the marginal shot. Where before this year you could find .223 Rem. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. Get the 243. Equally important to the gun you choose is a good scope with sufficient eye relief. It has little to no more felt recoil than the 223, and is a better round if you are hunting deer. bullet weight, rifle weight, barrel length, barrel twist, barrel wear, angle of stock, etc.) Remember that. Federal lists only two .223 Rem. Fire a 120-grain in the 7mm-08 at 3100 fps to get 17.5 f-p at 12.7 fps. I’m also not saying your .223 Rem. .223 vs .243 The .223 is going to be easier on wallet and recoil less. Added powder increases velocity and energy, which translates to what the Internet calls “knock-down power” (more on that later). can’t kill a deer past 220 yards. Recoil of the 350 Legend will be almost exactly the same as 243. The .243 Winchester is a round used to hunt deer and similar sized animals, some people use it on larger animals but it really isn't made for anything much bigger than a deer. Back to top #3 Glen Glen. In non-pandemic times, the .223 Rem. [Re: … I estimate that fifteen foot pounds of free recoil energy and 10 fps of recoil velocity represent the approximate upper limit of the comfort level. Donald Trump wasn't elected president in spite of who he is and how he acts, he was elected precisely because of who is and how he acts. as well. Couldn't take the kids to the range, so I thought I'd bring the range to them. It is hotter than a .222 but not as hot as a .22-250, so there should be no worry about barrel wear and reduced life. can maintain enough velocity to take varmint and medium-sized game out to 250 yards, or the distance at which the bullet is still travelling about 2,300 fps, according to Frank C. Barnes’ “Cartridges of the World.” But that range doesn’t apply to every bullet. The .243 sends a bigger bullet down range and is a great long range flat shooting round in a small package capable and legal to shoot deer with. But you're still talking about 10-11 ft lbs of recoil, which isn't much. November 11, 2019. Thread Status: Not open for further replies. Barnes lists 12 bullet weights commercially available for .243 Win., ranging from a 55-grain boat tail to a 105-grain hollow-point boat tail. As I’ve stated before: the .223 Remington and .308 Winchester are both solid rifle cartridges. When most of us think of recoil, we think of the actual kick that is felt when the gun is fired. Of the cartridges designed to work in standard AR15 rifles the 6.5 Grendel or some variant of the 6.8's are the only ones that really improve on 223 ballistics. The decision for which round is better for a given application should be made with complete information, and this article simply serves as a comparative guide, not the final say. Recoil of the 350 Legend will be almost exactly the same as 243. Your best bet would be a bolt action 223 since ammo is so prevelent and inexpensive, compare prices of 223 and 22-250 and you'll see what i mean. This is a good illustration of the recoil. Some prefer higher caliber weapons, while some prefer smaller ones, with less recoil and better aim. In 2020, .243 Win. vs. .243 Win. In this comparison, the .243 Win. bullet weight, rifle weight, barrel length, barrel twist, barrel wear, angle of stock, etc.) As far as a hunting cartridge goes the .243 is one of the most versatile cartridges there are. 10 Early Ice … A lot of factors go into the actual “felt recoil” that we can’t put numbers on for comparison. Written By Ron Spomer The sun was on the Nebraska horizon and a Mossberg 243 Winchester bolt-action was on my shoulder when a herd of November whitetails exploded from a copse of trees and scattered into the Sandhills. So the .223 and .243 are very different cartridges. #3350940 10/01/09: Joined: Mar 2008. How does a 243 Winchester, for instance, compare against the kick of a 270 Winchester or 300 Winchester Magnum? Shootability was developed by Winchester in 1955 for use in its Model 70 bolt-action and Model 88 lever-action rifles. I wouldn't worry about it. We were looking at nearly double the recoil energy of the .308 compared to some .243 rounds. Too bad we're not allowed silencers like in UK. 6.5 Creedmoor vs 223. Such as my state of Washington requires .24 caliber/6mm minimum. I have to ask however if you are ever going to decide to hunt with it? Whitetail Deer Cartridge Shoot-Out: .30-30 Win. generates only 4.07 ft. lbs. It was developed in 1957 for an experimental rifle known as the AR-15. True “knock-down power” depends on your bullet’s construction and minimum velocity, your cartridge, and your barrel length. By Ron Spomer. , Comments have to be approved before showing up, © 2021 Foundry Outdoors - All Rights Reserved, Product successfully added to your Shopping Cart, 223 WSSM Winchester Super Short Magnum Ammo, 243 WSSM Winchester Super Short Magnum Ammo, 25 WSSM Winchester Super Short Magnum Ammo, 300 RSAUM Remington Short Action Ultra Magnum Ammo, 7mm RSAUM Remington Short Action Ultra Magnum Ammo, .223 Remington vs .243 Winchester Ammo Comparison - Ballistics Info & Chart. The .223 was also chambered in many bolt-action hunting rifles, showing fine accuracy. A 243 has more powder, 25 gr 223 vs ~38-40 for 243. is the most popular rifle in America, and Weatherby offers tack-driving bolt guns in both calibers in a wide variety of configurations. Capable of using the same bullets that the .22-250 and .220 Swift were pushing, the .223 gave a respectable and useable trajectory, with less recoil, in a smaller package. The .243 Win. Just make sure your gun is … I have 2 of them for both of my girls, and neither has a problem with recoil. I like having the extra power and range for medium-sized animals, and I don’t see much downside for varmint hunting. I like that .223 is not as overbore as .243. produces about half the felt recoil of the .243 Win. Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by browning308, Feb 10, 2011. Re: .243 & 7mm-08, recoil difference...how much? Can kill a deer on the spot but you cant hunt with them. To put this into perspective, a Boeing 737 commercial airliner travels at a cruising speed of 600 mph, or 880 fps. Joined: Mar 2008. Don't discount the .243 Winchester as a long range cartridge. 22-250 vs 223 vs 204 Ruger vs 220 Swift: Ammunition Selection So a .223 Remington round exits the barrel with kinetic energy equal to the energy required for linear vertical displacement of 1250 pounds through a one foot distance, while a .243 Winchester round exiting the barrel has energy equal to the amount required to displace 1950 pounds over the same one foot distance. The recoil is still no problemo. I would say the 223 is an experts caliber. The recoil is still no problemo. +1 223 has no recoil I may be wrong because only 243 I've ever fired was loud as hell and booted like hell bit it was a … The .243 Win. are synonymous with both deer and varmint hunting, so we decided to pit them against each other to see who comes out on top. Shot placement has to be surgically precise with a 223 on deer sized game and a 243 with good bullets is a lot more forgiving. Posts: 3,239. Vs. .22-250 Rem. Recoil is the downfall of many shooters, men as well as women, adults as well as kids, heavyweights as well as lightweights. If you want a hunting rifle that's incredibly accurate with very little recoil, a .243 is all you need. MN. Although I have killed a lot of deer with a 22 center fire, I would opt for the 243. Coyote Cartridges: .223 Rem. Whatever you do make sure you get a stock that fits her. Please note, the following information reflects the estimated average ballistics for each caliber and does not pertain to a particular manufacturer, bullet weight, or jacketing type. what i find funny is a 22 cal. Campfire Guide. This does come at the expense of more (though not excessive) recoil and muzzle blast though. Anonymous. The longer you shoot, and the harder the rifle kicks, the more likely you are to flinch. There seem to be a never ending discussion about what caliber is the best and what weapon to use, especially when it comes to hunting. What does the recoil of a 25-06 compare to? load will reliably kill a deer out to 500 yards. Some have reported taking bears or elk, but at that point, you might be pushing it. Every major manufacturer makes a bolt gun in both calibers, so that’s not a distinguishing factor. Ballistically speaking, these calibers would be cousins rather than brothers. yukonal. The 243 has alittle more recoil than the 22-250 but the best one to use would be a 223 or a 17cal of some kind less you are going for the really long shots then go with a 243 or 22-250. For this reason, we are going to spend a little time discussing it in the context of the 6.5 Creedmoor vs .243. The .243 Winchester is simply the .308 Winchester necked down to hold .243″ diameter bullets. But for purposes of this comparison, I’d give the edge to the .243 Win. Our website lists special deals on 9mm Ammo, 10mm Ammo, 45-70 Ammo, 6.5 Creedmoor ammo, 300 Blackout Ammo, 10mm Ammo, 5.56 Ammo, Underwood Ammo, Buffalo Bore Ammo and more special deals on bulk ammo. [Re: new2turkey] ARCOREY Die Hard Member with a vengeance Registered: 12/27/05 Posts: 4839 Loc: USA If in doubt, get a Simms slip on recoil pad for him and have at it. double in price. The recoil of the .308 could reduce accuracy for novice shooters compared to a .243. My wife has a .243 stainless tikka that we cut the stock down and added a limbsaver pad. As I’ve stated before: the .223 Remington and .308 Winchester are both solid rifle cartridges. are identical, the .223 will have slightly less recoil because of the lower powder weight for a given velocity. Still I think the 7-08 is a better overall round for big game hunting, and recoil isn't that much more than the .243. Still, recoil can be daunting for newcomers to the sport and might play a role in the decision-making process. .223 recoil is about 3 or 4 pounds,.243 is around 8.5 to 11, and 30/30 is about 10 to 12. But you're still talking about 10-11 ft lbs of recoil, which isn't much. And can feel the difference in recoil between premium LE ammo, same weight, in .223 vs 5.56. 67 posts • Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3. Also, the effects of recoil are cumulative. The .243 Win. Step down to an 80-grain bullet in the 243 at 3,400 fps and recoil drops to 11 f-p at 10 fps. ... 243 Win. Generally speaking, (very generally; calm down, everyone) a .223 Rem. Theoretically, if all other variables (e.g. 223 vs 243 vs 270 . Velocity. The ideal coyote hunting cartridge is flat shooting, highly accurate, and won’t ruin pelts. If you’re up for … That is to say, .223 Remington bullets travel 3.6 times the speed of a 737 airplane at cruising speed, while .243 Winchester bullets travel 3.6 times that same speed. Much louder than a 223. produces about half the felt recoil of the .243 Win. Above that recoil becomes increasingly intrusive. for about 30 cents per round, now you’ll be lucky to find anything in stock below 60 cents. Some of my spots are in semi urban areas (yes legal to shoot a rifle), so the less noise the better. The major difference deals less with size and more with pressure. Shooting forum Centerfire rifles. In the shooting sports we call that reaction recoil or "kick." 223 and use a Barnes for the deer. Please email us if you have questions about any of our product listings. Then of course there’s the long range rock star competitive round 6.5 Creedmoor against the .223/5.56 combat load issue of the military and well known among recreational shooters. A quick video showcasing the 223 and 243 cartridges against my fake deer target. is a necked-down .308 Win., so it holds nearly twice as much powder as the .223 Rem. Ballistics, as they say, are king, so I’m giving the ultimate nod to the .243 Win. I guess I’ll just have to own both. “Versatility” refers to both range of bullet weights available and range of actions chambered in a specific cartridge. As illustrated in the chart, .223 Remington rounds - on average - achieve a velocity of about 3150 feet per second (fps) while .243 Winchester rounds travel at a velocity of 3180 fps. yukonal. Inside the gun community there are always talks about which is the better caliber, such as .308 vs the .243 or 9mm against the .45 ACP. The recoil in a properly set up rifle would be comfortable enough for a youngster. First off, debate of this topic can get fairly heated, but for safety’s sake it is wise to shoot only .223 rounds out of a .223 barrel and likewise with the 5.56. Well, that’s going to depend on a couple of parameters, and your … wins hands-down. Anybody got advice on 223 vs 243 vs 270?I'm after target, but more so game (vermin) at goat or medium boar size...Cheers and happy shooting!!P. First we must recall that for every action there is an opposite and equal reaction. The .260 is less recoil than the .308, and is 1000 yard capable. Go with the .223 Remington as the recoil that cartridge produces is virtually non-existant. 2 0. What I want is a lighter cal rifle that is a pleasure to shoot and still can take white tailed size game. Federal’s 55-grain Trophy Cooper, for example, has a minimum velocity for full expansion of only 1,800 fps. My wife has no trouble managing the.243 recoil and many friend's/relative's wives and kids own and use a … It’s a small-to-medium sized game caliber whose primary use has been taking down four-legged rather than two-legged critters. In terms of comfort, the .223 Rem. Campfire Guide. Vs. .243 Win. The 243 has more recoil than either 223 or 22-250. are identical, the .223 will have slightly less recoil because of the lower powder weight for a … A 55-grain or 75-grain Nosler Ballistic Tip or Hornady V-Max bullet would do great work against varmints while a 100-grain Sierra Game King could take down any whitetail in North America. Versatility You didn’t have to pull my arm out of it’s socket for that solution. The .260 is less recoil than the .308, and is 1000 yard capable. Flashing tails, leaping legs, long necks and there! Re: 223 vs 243 vs 270 by duncan61 » Sun Nov 13, 2016 1:05 pm Ive never shot a 270 but I have shot the 30/06.The ballistics are nearly at 7mm rem so Its got some go With a brake you won't have any ill effects due to recoil on the 6.5. RE: Recoil .223 VS .243 i had the same delema years back,wanted a 223 for predators but realised this cartridge wasn't good for deer.went with the 243 and love it.its fun to shoot(all day if need be)and there realy is no recoil to speak of.i can watch the bullet hit its intended target thru the scope every time,if the 243 had major recoil this wouldn't be possible. Not a huge difference, but more than enough for many shooters. It’s better suited for varmint hunting than big game hunting, but a 62-grain Fusion or even a 55-grain Trophy Copper would reliably take down a whitetail given proper shot placement. This is usually achieved by determining the maximum range at which a bullet has retained enough velocity to fully expand. I am looking for a new rifle and I can't decide between 223 and 243. This post was edited on 1/12 at 5:32 pm Please click the above links to take a look at all of the .223 Remington and .243 Winchester ammo we have in stock and ready to ship, and let us know any parting thoughts in the comment section below. As such, the following is for comparative information purposes only and should not be used to make precise predictions of the trajectory, performance, or true ballistics of any particular .223 Remington or .243 Winchester rounds for hunting, target shooting, plinking, or any other usage. “Shootability” is a broad term we’re using to mean “how available is this caliber and how comfortable is it to shoot?”. BTHP T2 TAP 5.56 NATO. A .243 will wear you down during extended shooting, the recoil and muzzle blast will just tire you out after a couple of hours of shooting if not sooner. Fishing. To put this into perspective, a Boeing 737 commercial airliner travels at a cruising speed of 600 mph, or 880 fps. A deer shot through the lungs with either of these light bullets isn’t going to shake it off and walk home for dinner. The .243 Win. I think you let him try the 30/30 and if that works, and you want to buy him a youth model rifle then the.243 would be perfect. vs. .30-06 Springfield Three of the most revered deer-hunting rounds in a head-to-head-to-head comparison By Ron Spomer Which of the two make a better choice for a hunting cartridge? Theoretically, if all other variables (e.g. I like that .243 has substantially more ft. lbs of energy. I've fired both and the 22-250 typically has more recoil because I shoot faster loads in it. 243 Winchester vs. 30-30 Win. It’s true that bullet construction and shot placement will kill an animal more effectively than poor shooting with a huge caliber. Diving deeper, Winchester says it has nearly 63% less recoil than the 450 Bushmaster, 18% less than .243 Win, and 11% less than 30-30 Win. If you're looking for a cheap shooting round to acclimate you to shooting, the .223 is cheap, and the .22LR is cheaper yet. May 14. I am a short action fan and would not reccomend the .270 for a woman. Generally speaking, a heavier bullet travelling faster will give you a better chance of putting down an animal. cartridges as “available” to order online: the 53-grain Varmint and Predator and the 69 grain Gold Medal Match. You see, although the cartridges are essentially the same size, the leade of the barrel is different. 64-grain: 3.3 foot pounds: 5.1 fps Fire any of the above in a heavier rifle and all felt recoil goes down. Since this year is such an anomaly (I hope), I’m going to give the overall nod in this category to the .223 Rem. Just my 2 cent. Big bucks, land management, rut reports, and tips for the whitetail obsessed. +1 223 has no recoil I may be wrong because only 243 I've ever fired was loud as hell and booted like hell bit it was a … Best yet is to start them with a .223, then get them a 7-08. The 350 gets over 23% more penetration than .243 Win and 60% more than .223 Rem. Note that the most powerful shotgun loads generate recoil comparable to elephant rifle cartridges. When looking at the .22LR vs .223, the truth is that the .223 is, in fact, a .22 caliber round. 22=250's CAN burn out a barrel faster than a 223 will, depending on the velocity of ammo used, and frequency of use. Comparing both cartridges in 7.5 pound rifles, the .223 firing a 62 grain bullet at a 3,020 fps. They help a good bit and are easily removed. With dozens of countries relying on the .223/5.56 to arm their infantry, there’s usually plenty of it to go around. is the obvious winner. Recoil. I shot lots of 223, but not the 243 and I am interested in recoil and noise. I’m not saying your .243 Win. A 243 is a.308 case necked down to.243 I have seen the splash in my scope many times with both but the.243 has more recoil. Furthermore, the muzzle energy of a .223 Remington round averages out to 1250 ft-lb, while a .243 Winchester round averages out to about 1950 ft-lb. Recoil will be affected by the load and the rifle, but here is some general info on recoil energy..243 - about 8lbs.260 - about 10lbs.257 - about 10lbs.25-06 - about 12.5lbs.270 - about 18lbs. The .223 is a smaller bullet not just in size but, a good deal in weight and does not have the range or power that the .243 has. wins the availability battle. That gun’s modern military counterpart, the 5.56 NATO, has been in continuous use by militaries around the world since the early 1960s. The recoil kinetic energy figures below are taken from the Rifle Recoil Table and the Shotgun Recoil Table. Federal’s 85-grain Trophy Copper also has a minimum velocity of 1,800 fps, and it’s still cooking along at that speed well past 500 yards. The latter two are more common, but Henry makes a sweet lever gun called the “Long Ranger” in both calibers. Of the cartridges designed to work in standard AR15 rifles the 6.5 Grendel or some variant of the 6.8's are the only ones that really improve on 223 ballistics. The ammunition is more expensive, but it’s just as common (especially these days), and I can find rifles in lots of different actions and from many different manufacturers. Sniper. I was in a store ready to get one but it has to be special ordered and of course a 243 in stainless on his shelf is gonna cost me alot less then ordering a 25-06. Ballistics For just a little bit more recoil though, the 243 maintains deer-relevant energy much further than both the 300 Blackout and 223. The .223 Rem. The .223 Rem. The prices on Federal’s website don’t appear to have risen, but elsewhere I’ve seen .223 Rem. The .223 Remington wins over the .222 and its larger rival, the .22-250 in good ballistics with the minimum of powder and maximum efficiency. We have a variety of deals on Rifle Ammo, Handgun Ammo, Shotgun Ammo & Rimfire Ammo, as well as ammo for target practice, plinking, hunting, or shooting competitions. Then of course there’s the long range rock star competitive round 6.5 Creedmoor against the .223/5.56 combat load issue of the military and well known among recreational shooters. is the obvious winner. I wouldn't worry about it. 22-250 is almost twice the price of the 223 ammo. Recoil is not all that much more. Apparently the overriding factor was the greatly reduced recoil of the .223, which allowed a very high rate of fire and (most of all) didn't intimidate the inexperienced conscripts that formed the bulk of the U. S. military at the time. Capable of using the same bullets that the .22-250 and .220 Swift were pushing, the .223 gave a respectable and useable trajectory, with less recoil, in a smaller package. 204 vs 223 vs 22-250 vs 243. The .243 Win. 204 vs 223 vs 22-250 vs 243. And can feel the difference in recoil between premium LE ammo, same weight, in .223 vs 5.56. has slightly less range in terms of bullet weights (40 grain to 75 grain), but it covers basically the same ground. Oct 19, 2020 #13 But your past doesn’t define you, and it doesn’t define these calibers either. In his excellent handbook, “Cartridges of the World,” Frank C. Barnes describes the .30-0... Our picks for the week’s best hunting, fishing, wild foods, and conservation content. You’ll probably pay twice as much per round as .223 Rem., but at least you’ll have something to shoot. For many hunters, the .223 Rem. I would also be using the rifle for target shooting form 100-500 yards. In a normal year, the .223 Rem. A .243 Win. Make no mistake the 223 will DRT any deer with proper shot placement and shot placement above all things takes game. The .243 Win. Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next > browning308 Member. As you can see, there is a considerable difference between the .270 and the others. Shooters who would never think of shooting a .416 Rem. This round is a modification of the .308 Winchester . When it comes to availability, it’s always good to bet on the NATO caliber. The 223 is not legal for hunting in many states. As to just target shooting,both are equally accurate at that range but .243 costs more to shoot. Joined: Feb 10, 2011 Messages: 31. If anyone is willing to take me shooting the 243 I will be eternally grateful. by contrast achieves only about 1,400 foot-pounds of energy by throwing a 75-grain projectile 2,900 fps. For this reason, we are going to spend a little time discussing it in the context of the 6.5 Creedmoor vs .243. 223 and use a Barnes for the deer. In terms of comfort, the .223 Rem. It even has over 14% more energy than 300 Blackout, 15% more than 30-30 Win, and 49% more than .223 Rem. Still, recoil can be daunting for newcomers to the sport and might play a role in the decision-making process. ... Best yet is to start them with a .223, then get them a 7-08. 95-grain: 9 foot pounds: 8.5 fps: 223 Rem. Top #2012095 - 10/04/11 09:06 PM Re: recoil comparison of a .223 and a .243? It's also 1000 yard capable, and has low recoil , lower than the .260 Rem. Both the .22-250 and .220 Swift are very flat shooting, retain more kinetic energy, and have less wind drift than the .204 Ruger and .223 Remington. As Chuck Hawks notes in his great recoil table, the .223 Rem. It does make some noise and does recoil more than a "little" .223 but it can reach out and touch someone (some varmint) way better than the .223. hans471, Feb 11, 2011 #6. mc223 Member.